|
October 29, 2005 Economic Erosion - How Regulation Shrinks Opportunity |
|||
|
In response to a student's post about how
taxes and government regulations reduce the
level of economic activity in the private
sector.
You are on the right track. If you think of two parties making a deal in a free market (voluntarily) their is a price range within which a deal is possible. The seller usually will not sell below his cost. The buyer will not pay more than the perceived value of the utility that the buyer expects to receive from the purchase. ![]()
Imagine that this graph applies to only one
seller and one buyer. They will normally agree
on a price some place between the intersection
of the supply curve and the vertical axis and
the demand curve and the vertical axis.
When government introduces additional costs into
the picture (tariffs, taxes, regulations, etc.)
the price range within which a deal can be made
is narrowed. Now the seller must cover his costs
of production plus any additional costs imposed
by government. The buyer will still not pay
an amount greater than the value of the utility
he expects from the purchase even though some of
that cost goes to government, lawyers, etc.
The result is that the potential price range
narrows for many and for a certain number of
buyers and sellers it disappears. With every
increase in such costs imposed by government,
more potential transactions disappear. In this
way, regulation and trade barriers reduce the
amount of economic activity, since fewer and
fewer deals make economic sense to market
participants.
|
|||